Professor Dr. Shahiduzzaman, a Bangladeshi academic known for his expertise in international relations, has sparked controversy by advocating for a nuclear treaty between Bangladesh and Pakistan.
Speaking at a seminar organised by the Retired Armed Forces Officers Welfare Association (RAOWA) in Dhaka, Shahiduzzaman's proposal hinges on the need to counterbalance India's influence in South Asia. He suggested that a Pakistan-Bangladesh alliance, particularly in the realm of nuclear defence, could serve as a strategic deterrent against Indian hegemony in the region. His proposal has gained traction among some former military officials, especially those with conservative and anti-India leanings, following the ousting of the Sheikh Hasina government.
Shahiduzzaman argued that Pakistan, with its established nuclear program, could serve as a reliable security partner for Bangladesh, offering a means to strengthen its defence capabilities in the face of perceived threats from India. The political shift in Bangladesh, where the departure of Sheikh Hasina has opened the door for more nationalist discourse, appears to be driving some of the support for this idea.
However, Shahiduzzaman's advocacy is marred by his controversial personal history. In 2013, while serving as a professor at Dhaka University, he was accused of sexual misconduct by a female student. An inquiry found him guilty, leading to public protests and widespread outrage. Despite these serious allegations and the subsequent damage to his reputation, Shahiduzzaman continues to participate in public discourse and appears frequently in the media. His credibility, however, remains under question due to this history.
The juxtaposition of Shahiduzzaman's past with his political aspirations raises significant ethical concerns. While his proposal touches on important regional security issues, many argue that his personal conduct disqualifies him from participating in such high-level policy discussions, especially on matters as consequential as nuclear alliances. Critics point out that allowing someone with a history of sexual misconduct to shape discussions on national security undermines public trust in leadership.
His proposal for a nuclear alliance also comes at a time when Bangladesh is grappling with its own #MeToo movement, raising questions about accountability and justice. The contradiction between Shahiduzzaman’s public intellectual role and his personal conduct casts a shadow over his ability to serve as a credible voice in shaping the nation's foreign policy.
In essence, Shahiduzzaman’s call for a nuclear treaty between Bangladesh and Pakistan reflects broader regional security concerns but is complicated by his controversial past. The idea of a strategic alliance with Pakistan may resonate with certain factions in Bangladesh, but the professor’s personal history complicates his standing in public discourse. As Bangladesh navigates both regional tensions and domestic calls for justice, it remains to be seen how figures like Shahiduzzaman will influence the nation's future trajectory.
ছাগলে কিনা ..........